![]() ![]() However, this is unlikely to have played a major role in the Lima crisis, as many hostages were released early on. Time: Spending a prolonged period with a person could promote the growth of a connection.Remember that many of the captives in the Lima crisis were diplomats who would have had experience with communication and negotiation. Rapport: Establishing a friendly rapport with a captor could contribute to a positive bond.In addition to these qualities, other factors could play a role: Ideology: Many of the captors had little knowledge of the actual political issues behind the operation and appeared to be involved more for monetary gain.įrom this information, it appears that individuals who develop Lima syndrome may be younger, more inexperienced, or lack strong convictions.Youth: Many of the MTRA members involved in the hostage crisis were teenagers or young adults.The following characteristics were also observed: ![]() Some even said that they wished to attend school in Japan in the future. Much of what we do know comes from the hostage crisis that gave Lima syndrome its name.Īfter the crisis, those involved were evaluated by a medical team, who found that many MTRA members developed attachments to their captives. Lima syndrome is still poorly understood, and there’s been very little research done into what causes it. The hostage crisis eventually ended in the spring of 1997 when the remaining hostages were freed during a special forces operation. The effects of Lima syndrome lessened the likelihood of the captives coming to harm while increasing the chances that they would be freed or allowed to escape. Rather than the hostages forming a positive bond with their captors, as happens in Stockholm syndrome, it appears that the reverse occurred -many of the captors began to feel sympathetic to their captives. Many of these hostages were of high importance, making their release seem counterintuitive in the context of the situation. In the first month of the crisis, a large number of hostages were released. Their captors were members of the Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (MTRA), whose key demand was the release of MTRA members from prison. Many of the captives were high-level diplomats and government officials. During this crisis, several hundred guests at a party held by the Japanese ambassador were captured and held hostage. Lima syndrome gets its name from a hostage crisis that began in late 1996 in Lima, Peru.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |